Teams › ASUN · Compare Queens University with another team

Queens University
Queens University returns 89% of last season's minutes and rates #105 on offense and #245 on defense of 365 teams. 80% range: -5.9 to +8.7.
Why we have them here
Queens University's preseason projection of +1.5 (No. 142 of 365) starts from the roster: its players' ratings, weighted by projected minutes, add up to a roll-up worth +0.7, about the +1.0 typical of teams ranked near it. Last season's rating (No. 195 at the end of 2025-26) adds +0.2, about its neighbours' +0.1; the program's level two and three seasons back and the roster's experience and shape add +0.3. It returns 89% of last season's minutes, more than teams ranked near it (51%). The projection leans most on Jordan Watford (+3.3), Yoav Berman (+1.7) and Avantae Parker (+0.5); the newcomer who matters most is Rickey Ballard, a transfer from Grambling, at +0.5. Its 80% range, -5.9 to +8.7, is about as wide as that of teams ranked near it.
Generated from the published projection's own terms, not written by hand. "Teams ranked near it" are the thirty nearest in the preseason order. Preseason projection frozen 2026-10-23; how the projection is built.
Roster
Returning 68% · Transfer 11% · Other newcomer 21%
| Rank | Player | Pos | Ht | D1 yrs | Group | From | MPG | Rating | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 171 | Jordan Watford | G | 6-5 | 1 | Returning | Queens University | 23 | +5.7 | +3.3 |
| 632 | Yoav Berman | G | 6-6 | 2 | Returning | Queens University | 27 | +2.4 | +1.7 |
| 1140 | Avantae Parker | F | 6-9 | 3 | Returning | Queens University | 21 | +1.0 | +0.5 |
| 1181 | Rickey Ballard | F | 6-7 | 4 | Transfer | Grambling | 22 | +0.8 | +0.5 |
| 1444 | Nasir Mann | F | 6-5 | 3 | Returning | Queens University | 26 | +0.2 | +0.2 |
| 2849 | Seamus Wilson | F | 6-0 | 0 | Other newcomer | 8 | -1.4 | -0.3 | |
| 3016 | Colby Christiansen | F | 6-2 | 0 | Other newcomer | 8 | -1.6 | -0.3 | |
| 3108 | Matthew Walter | F | 6-3 | 0 | Other newcomer | 8 | -1.6 | -0.3 | |
| 3108 | Saif-Allah Zatari | F | 6-3 | 0 | Other newcomer | 8 | -1.6 | -0.3 | |
| 3310 | Danzelle Bullock Coles | F | 6-5 | 0 | Other newcomer | 9 | -1.7 | -0.4 | |
| 3645 | Jacob Brandly | G | 6-6 | 1 | Returning | Queens University | 6 | -2.4 | -0.4 |
| 3856 | Tyler Crider | G | 6-0 | 1 | Returning | Queens University | 6 | -2.6 | -0.4 |
| 4409 | Reid Celestin | G | 6-6 | 1 | Returning | Queens University | 7 | -3.5 | -0.6 |
| 4557 | Isaiah Henry | G | 6-4 | 1 | Returning | Queens University | 10 | -3.1 | -0.8 |
| 4802 | Kam Clark | F | 6-7 | 1 | Returning | Queens University | 9 | -3.8 | -0.9 |
A player's rating is points per 100 possessions better than an average Division I player while he is on the floor. Contribution weights it by the share of a rotation slot he is projected to play, so a star on the bench and a role player who never sits both read right. Rank is among all 5,249 rated players. MPG is the projected share of a rotation slot times 40. "From" is last season's team. The bars are contribution, the player's rating times his projected share; their sum is the roll-up the projection starts from.
Schedule
| Date | Opponent | Proj. margin | Win prob. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon Nov 02 | N | +1.5 | 55% | ||
| Wed Nov 04 | at | -4.8 | 35% | ||
| Fri Nov 06 | at | -10.5 | 20% | ||
| Tue Nov 10 | at | -20.5 | 5% | ||
| Sat Nov 14 | vs | +11.8 | 83% | ||
| Sat Nov 21 | at | -14.5 | 12% | ||
| Tue Nov 24 | at | +1.2 | 54% | ||
| Sun Nov 29 | at | -21.9 | 4% | ||
| Wed Dec 02 | vs | +11.8 | 83% | ||
| Sat Dec 05 | at | +6.8 | 71% | ||
| Tue Dec 08 | at | -11.4 | 18% | ||
| Wed Dec 09 | at | -16.2 | 10% | ||
| Mon Dec 14 | at | -1.4 | 46% | ||
| Wed Dec 16 | vs | +9.2 | 77% | ||
| Sat Dec 19 | at | +1.6 | 55% | ||
| Mon Dec 21 | at | +0.6 | 52% | ||
| Thu Dec 31 | vs | +6.9 | 71% | ||
| Sat Jan 02 | vs | +10.4 | 80% | ||
| Sat Jan 09 | at | conf | +3.2 | 60% | |
| Thu Jan 14 | vs | conf | +6.3 | 70% | |
| Sat Jan 16 | vs | conf | +10.1 | 79% | |
| Thu Jan 21 | at | conf | +3.9 | 62% | |
| Sat Jan 23 | at | conf | +3.9 | 62% | |
| Thu Jan 28 | vs | conf | +8.4 | 75% | |
| Sat Jan 30 | vs | conf | +1.5 | 55% | |
| Sat Feb 06 | vs | conf | +8.6 | 76% | |
| Thu Feb 11 | at | conf | +5.1 | 66% | |
| Sat Feb 13 | at | conf | +0.6 | 52% | |
| Thu Feb 18 | vs | conf | +8.4 | 75% | |
| Sat Feb 20 | vs | conf | +9.0 | 77% | |
| Thu Feb 25 | at | conf | -4.1 | 37% | |
| Sat Feb 27 | at | conf | +3.3 | 60% |
Projected margin is from Queens University's side, with home court where the game is not neutral (N). Games are the schedule as posted; tournaments and late additions appear as they are listed. Predictions are as of 2026-10-26 and reflect the roster as the model has it on that date.