Teams › Metro · Compare Quinnipiac with another team

Quinnipiac
Quinnipiac returns 67% of last season's minutes and rates #231 on offense and #185 on defense of 365 teams. 80% range: -9.0 to +5.5.
Why we have them here
Quinnipiac's preseason projection of -1.7 (No. 200 of 365) starts from the roster: its players' ratings, weighted by projected minutes, add up to a roll-up worth -1.3, about the -1.3 typical of teams ranked near it. Last season's rating (No. 166 at the end of 2025-26) adds +0.0, about its neighbours' -0.2; the program's level two and three seasons back and the roster's experience and shape add -0.7. It returns 67% of last season's minutes, about the same as teams ranked near it (66%). The projection leans most on Keith McKnight (+1.8), Tai Turnage (+1.3) and Asim Jones (+1.0); the newcomer who matters most is Tayeshawn Cunningham-Pemberton, a newcomer from outside Division I, at -0.3. Its 80% range, -9.0 to +5.5, is about as wide as that of teams ranked near it.
Generated from the published projection's own terms, not written by hand. "Teams ranked near it" are the thirty nearest in the preseason order. Preseason projection frozen 2026-10-23; how the projection is built.
Roster
Returning 63% · Transfer 12% · Other newcomer 25%
| Rank | Player | Pos | Ht | D1 yrs | Group | From | MPG | Rating | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 533 | Keith McKnight | G | 6-7 | 1 | Returning | Quinnipiac | 23 | +3.0 | +1.8 |
| 645 | Tai Turnage | G | 6-0 | 1 | Returning | Quinnipiac | 18 | +3.0 | +1.3 |
| 912 | Asim Jones | G | 6-2 | 2 | Returning | Quinnipiac | 25 | +1.6 | +1.0 |
| 1335 | Samson Reilly | G | 6-2 | 1 | Returning | Quinnipiac | 13 | +0.7 | +0.2 |
| 2213 | Christopher Skenderi | F | 6-7 | 1 | Returning | Quinnipiac | 8 | -0.8 | -0.2 |
| 2947 | Tayeshawn Cunningham-Pemberton | F | 6-3 | 0 | Other newcomer | 8 | -1.5 | -0.3 | |
| 2993 | Malik Fields | F | 6-4 | 0 | Other newcomer | 8 | -1.5 | -0.3 | |
| 3022 | Nedas Cholevinskas | F | 6-5 | 0 | Other newcomer | 8 | -1.6 | -0.3 | |
| 3114 | Lucas Sekasi | F | 6-6 | 0 | Other newcomer | 8 | -1.7 | -0.3 | |
| 3415 | Jayden Reid | F | 6-9 | 0 | Other newcomer | 8 | -1.8 | -0.4 | |
| 3415 | Ali Diouf | F | 6-9 | 0 | Other newcomer | 8 | -1.8 | -0.4 | |
| 3990 | Akintola Akinniyi | F | 6-7 | 2 | Returning | Quinnipiac | 7 | -2.6 | -0.5 |
| 4016 | Braylan Ritvo | F | 6-8 | 1 | Returning | Quinnipiac | 9 | -2.4 | -0.5 |
| 4104 | Sam Nosakhare | F | 6-9 | 1 | Returning | Quinnipiac | 10 | -2.4 | -0.6 |
| 4185 | Nas Hart | F | 6-10 | 1 | Transfer | La Salle | 11 | -2.4 | -0.7 |
| 4767 | Nate Guerengomba | G | 6-4 | 2 | Returning | Quinnipiac | 14 | -3.1 | -1.1 |
| 5080 | Holden Pierre-Louis | F | 6-8 | 2 | Transfer | Cleveland State | 13 | -4.3 | -1.4 |
A player's rating is points per 100 possessions better than an average Division I player while he is on the floor. Contribution weights it by the share of a rotation slot he is projected to play, so a star on the bench and a role player who never sits both read right. Rank is among all 5,249 rated players. MPG is the projected share of a rotation slot times 40. "From" is last season's team. The bars are contribution, the player's rating times his projected share; their sum is the roll-up the projection starts from.
Schedule
| Date | Opponent | Proj. margin | Win prob. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon Nov 02 | at | -23.8 | 3% | ||
| Thu Nov 05 | vs | +9.8 | 79% | ||
| Sun Nov 08 | at | -5.6 | 32% | ||
| Thu Nov 12 | vs | +5.5 | 67% | ||
| Sun Nov 15 | at | -0.4 | 49% | ||
| Thu Nov 19 | vs | +9.5 | 78% | ||
| Sun Nov 29 | at | -11.5 | 18% | ||
| Fri Dec 04 | at | conf | +0.2 | 51% | |
| Sun Dec 06 | vs | conf | +2.0 | 57% | |
| Sat Dec 12 | vs | +1.9 | 56% | ||
| Sat Dec 19 | at | -19.0 | 6% | ||
| Mon Dec 21 | at | -3.6 | 39% | ||
| Tue Dec 29 | at | conf | +5.3 | 67% | |
| Fri Jan 01 | vs | conf | +5.0 | 66% | |
| Sun Jan 03 | at | conf | -2.8 | 41% | |
| Fri Jan 08 | at | conf | +2.1 | 57% | |
| Sun Jan 10 | vs | conf | +2.0 | 57% | |
| Sat Jan 16 | vs | conf | +6.5 | 70% | |
| Mon Jan 18 | at | conf | -0.5 | 49% | |
| Fri Jan 22 | vs | conf | +5.0 | 65% | |
| Sun Jan 24 | vs | conf | +3.4 | 61% | |
| Fri Jan 29 | at | conf | -1.9 | 44% | |
| Sun Jan 31 | vs | conf | +9.2 | 77% | |
| Fri Feb 05 | at | conf | +4.3 | 64% | |
| Sun Feb 07 | at | conf | +3.2 | 60% | |
| Thu Feb 11 | vs | conf | +6.0 | 69% | |
| Sat Feb 13 | at | conf | -0.8 | 48% | |
| Sun Feb 21 | vs | conf | +2.0 | 56% | |
| Fri Feb 26 | at | conf | +0.7 | 52% | |
| Sun Feb 28 | vs | conf | +1.0 | 53% |
Projected margin is from Quinnipiac's side, with home court where the game is not neutral (N). Games are the schedule as posted; tournaments and late additions appear as they are listed. Predictions are as of 2026-10-26 and reflect the roster as the model has it on that date.