Teams › A-10 · Compare Fordham with another team

Fordham
Fordham returns 64% of last season's minutes and rates #140 on offense and #115 on defense of 365 teams. 80% range: -4.4 to +10.1.
Why we have them here
Fordham's preseason projection of +2.8 (No. 125 of 365) starts from the roster: its players' ratings, weighted by projected minutes, add up to a roll-up worth +3.7, more than the +1.8 typical of teams ranked near it. Last season's rating (No. 191 at the end of 2025-26) adds -0.4, less than its neighbours' +0.4; the program's level two and three seasons back and the roster's experience and shape add -0.8. It returns 64% of last season's minutes, more than teams ranked near it (55%). The projection leans most on Dejour Reaves (+2.8), Lateef Patrick (+2.0) and Rikus Schulte (+2.0); the newcomer who matters most is Lateef Patrick, a transfer from Stephen F. Austin, at +2.0. Its 80% range, -4.4 to +10.1, is about as wide as that of teams ranked near it.
Generated from the published projection's own terms, not written by hand. "Teams ranked near it" are the thirty nearest in the preseason order. Preseason projection frozen 2026-10-23; how the projection is built.
Roster
Returning 64% · Transfer 30% · Freshman 6%
| Rank | Player | Pos | Ht | D1 yrs | Group | From | MPG | Rating | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 298 | Dejour Reaves | G | 6-0 | 3 | Returning | Fordham | 26 | +4.3 | +2.8 |
| 467 | Lateef Patrick | G | 1 | Transfer | Stephen F. Austin | 24 | +3.4 | +2.0 | |
| 475 | Rikus Schulte | F | 6-9 | 3 | Returning | Fordham | 23 | +3.4 | +2.0 |
| 572 | Amir Lindsey | G | 5-11 | 2 | Transfer | UAlbany | 27 | +2.7 | +1.8 |
| 1194 | Roor Akhuar | F | 6-7 | 1 | Returning | Fordham | 16 | +0.9 | +0.4 |
| 1348 | Kelvin Odih | G | 6-4 | 1 | Transfer | St. John's | 5 | +0.9 | +0.1 |
| 1680 | Abass Bodija | F | 6-10 | 1 | Returning | Fordham | 14 | +0.0 | +0.0 |
| 1812 | John Laboy II | G | 6-3 | 1 | Transfer | Miami | 4 | -0.4 | +0.0 |
| 2052 | Jack Whitbourn | C | 6-11 | 2 | Returning | Fordham | 14 | -0.5 | -0.2 |
| 2486 | Aidan Crotty | G | 5-11 | 1 | Returning | Fordham | 3 | -1.7 | -0.1 |
| 2574 | Desmond Bellot | G | 6-3 | 0 | Freshman | High school | 6 | -1.4 | -0.2 |
| 2636 | Hassan Koureissi | G | 6-3 | 0 | Freshman | High school | 6 | -1.5 | -0.2 |
| 2644 | Akira Jacobs | F | 6-10 | 3 | Returning | Fordham | 20 | -0.8 | -0.4 |
| 2703 | Jameson O'Toole | G | 6-3 | 2 | Returning | Fordham | 4 | -1.9 | -0.2 |
| 3188 | Max Miller | G | 6-0 | 2 | Returning | Fordham | 3 | -2.8 | -0.2 |
| 3684 | Kingston Price | G | 6-2 | 1 | Returning | Fordham | 5 | -2.7 | -0.4 |
A player's rating is points per 100 possessions better than an average Division I player while he is on the floor. Contribution weights it by the share of a rotation slot he is projected to play, so a star on the bench and a role player who never sits both read right. Rank is among all 5,249 rated players. MPG is the projected share of a rotation slot times 40. "From" is last season's team. The bars are contribution, the player's rating times his projected share; their sum is the roll-up the projection starts from.
Schedule
| Date | Opponent | Proj. margin | Win prob. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon Nov 02 | at | -20.2 | 5% | ||
| Thu Nov 05 | vs | +14.9 | 89% | ||
| Tue Nov 10 | vs | +10.7 | 81% | ||
| Fri Nov 13 | vs | +7.9 | 74% | ||
| Tue Nov 17 | at | +1.9 | 56% | ||
| Sat Nov 21 | at | +2.8 | 59% | ||
| Sun Nov 22 | at | +0.1 | 50% | ||
| Sat Nov 28 | at | -4.0 | 37% | ||
| Tue Dec 01 | vs | +8.2 | 75% | ||
| Mon Dec 07 | vs | +12.2 | 84% | ||
| Thu Dec 10 | vs | +11.9 | 84% | ||
| Sun Dec 20 | vs | +11.5 | 83% | ||
| Wed Dec 30 | vs | conf | -4.0 | 37% | |
| Sat Jan 02 | at | conf | +0.5 | 51% | |
| Wed Jan 06 | at | conf | -3.9 | 37% | |
| Sat Jan 09 | vs | conf | +1.7 | 56% | |
| Wed Jan 13 | vs | conf | +1.9 | 56% | |
| Sat Jan 16 | at | conf | -1.1 | 47% | |
| Wed Jan 20 | at | conf | -1.9 | 44% | |
| Wed Jan 27 | vs | conf | +4.9 | 66% | |
| Sat Jan 30 | vs | conf | +1.5 | 55% | |
| Wed Feb 03 | at | conf | -2.1 | 43% | |
| Sat Feb 06 | vs | conf | -2.3 | 42% | |
| Tue Feb 09 | at | conf | -2.1 | 43% | |
| Sat Feb 13 | at | conf | -2.0 | 44% | |
| Tue Feb 16 | vs | conf | -5.2 | 34% | |
| Sat Feb 20 | vs | conf | +2.8 | 59% | |
| Sat Feb 27 | at | conf | -0.8 | 47% | |
| Wed Mar 03 | vs | conf | +2.0 | 56% | |
| Sat Mar 06 | at | conf | -1.9 | 44% |
Projected margin is from Fordham's side, with home court where the game is not neutral (N). Games are the schedule as posted; tournaments and late additions appear as they are listed. Predictions are as of 2026-10-26 and reflect the roster as the model has it on that date.