Teams › Ivy · Compare Princeton with another team

Princeton
Princeton returns 94% of last season's minutes and rates #149 on offense and #214 on defense of 365 teams. 80% range: -7.0 to +7.5.
Why we have them here
Princeton's preseason projection of +0.2 (No. 164 of 365) starts from the roster: its players' ratings, weighted by projected minutes, add up to a roll-up worth -0.4, about the -0.1 typical of teams ranked near it. Last season's rating (No. 255 at the end of 2025-26) adds -0.8, less than its neighbours' +0.5; the program's level two and three seasons back and the roster's experience and shape add +1.1. It returns 94% of last season's minutes, more than teams ranked near it (61%). The projection leans most on Jack Stanton (+2.2), Jackson Hicke (+1.7) and Landon Clark (+0.0); the newcomer who matters most is Christopher Kirkpatrick, a freshman, recruit No. 285, at -0.3. Its 80% range, -7.0 to +7.5, is about as wide as that of teams ranked near it.
Generated from the published projection's own terms, not written by hand. "Teams ranked near it" are the thirty nearest in the preseason order. Preseason projection frozen 2026-10-23; how the projection is built.
Roster
Returning 94% · Freshman 6%
| Rank | Player | Pos | Ht | D1 yrs | Group | From | MPG | Rating | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 431 | Jack Stanton | G | 6-2 | 2 | Returning | Princeton | 24 | +3.6 | +2.2 |
| 629 | Jackson Hicke | G | 6-5 | 3 | Returning | Princeton | 28 | +2.5 | +1.7 |
| 1607 | Landon Clark | G | 6-8 | 1 | Returning | Princeton | 22 | +0.1 | +0.0 |
| 2042 | Malik Abdullahi | F | 6-7 | 2 | Returning | Princeton | 20 | -0.4 | -0.2 |
| 2135 | Dalen Davis | G | 6-0 | 3 | Returning | Princeton | 19 | -0.5 | -0.2 |
| 2282 | Peyton Seals | G | 6-4 | 2 | Returning | Princeton | 7 | -0.9 | -0.2 |
| 2387 | Jake Sussberg | G | 6-5 | 1 | Returning | Princeton | 6 | -1.1 | -0.2 |
| 2659 | Jacob Huggins | F | 6-8 | 3 | Returning | Princeton | 17 | -0.8 | -0.4 |
| 2893 | Zio Kim | G | 6-4 | 2 | Returning | Princeton | 3 | -2.4 | -0.2 |
| 2913 | Will Kutzler | F | 6-7 | 1 | Returning | Princeton | 3 | -2.4 | -0.2 |
| 2952 | Christopher Kirkpatrick | G | 6-3 | 0 | Freshman | High school | 6 | -1.8 | -0.3 |
| 2975 | Ryan Mandes | G | 6-3 | 1 | Returning | Princeton | 3 | -2.6 | -0.2 |
| 2993 | CJ Happy | F | 6-9 | 2 | Returning | Princeton | 13 | -1.2 | -0.4 |
| 2993 | Cooper Mueller | G | 6-3 | 2 | Returning | Princeton | 3 | -2.5 | -0.2 |
| 3022 | Lucas Denault | G | 1 | Returning | Princeton | 3 | -2.7 | -0.2 | |
| 3173 | Louis O'Keefe | G | 6-3 | 0 | Freshman | High school | 5 | -2.1 | -0.3 |
| 3741 | Cash McSweeney | F | 6-8 | 1 | Returning | Princeton | 5 | -2.9 | -0.3 |
| 4263 | Jacob Hammond | F | 6-6 | 1 | Returning | Princeton | 5 | -3.6 | -0.5 |
| 4814 | Sebastian Whitfield | F | 6-6 | 1 | Returning | Princeton | 8 | -4.1 | -0.8 |
A player's rating is points per 100 possessions better than an average Division I player while he is on the floor. Contribution weights it by the share of a rotation slot he is projected to play, so a star on the bench and a role player who never sits both read right. Rank is among all 5,249 rated players. MPG is the projected share of a rotation slot times 40. "From" is last season's team. The bars are contribution, the player's rating times his projected share; their sum is the roll-up the projection starts from.
Schedule
| Date | Opponent | Proj. margin | Win prob. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu Nov 05 | vs | +3.4 | 61% | ||
| Sun Nov 08 | at | -3.4 | 39% | ||
| Wed Nov 11 | vs | +9.1 | 77% | ||
| Sun Nov 15 | at | -6.7 | 29% | ||
| Fri Nov 20 | vs | +6.9 | 71% | ||
| Wed Nov 25 | N | -0.5 | 48% | ||
| Fri Nov 27 | at | -8.0 | 26% | ||
| Sat Nov 28 | N | -1.5 | 45% | ||
| Thu Dec 03 | at | -4.0 | 37% | ||
| Sun Dec 06 | at | -0.2 | 49% | ||
| Sat Dec 12 | at | -4.3 | 36% | ||
| Tue Dec 22 | vs | +4.5 | 65% | ||
| Tue Dec 29 | at | -12.4 | 15% | ||
| Mon Jan 04 | vs | conf | +1.6 | 55% | |
| Sat Jan 09 | at | conf | -6.5 | 30% | |
| Sat Jan 16 | vs | conf | +6.7 | 71% | |
| Mon Jan 18 | vs | conf | +0.5 | 52% | |
| Sat Jan 23 | at | conf | -1.2 | 46% | |
| Fri Jan 29 | vs | conf | +2.5 | 58% | |
| Sat Jan 30 | vs | conf | -0.2 | 49% | |
| Sat Feb 06 | at | conf | -3.0 | 40% | |
| Fri Feb 12 | at | conf | -2.1 | 43% | |
| Sat Feb 13 | at | conf | -4.4 | 36% | |
| Fri Feb 19 | vs | conf | +2.9 | 59% | |
| Fri Feb 26 | at | conf | +1.8 | 56% | |
| Sat Feb 27 | at | conf | -2.8 | 41% | |
| Sat Mar 06 | vs | conf | -1.6 | 45% |
Projected margin is from Princeton's side, with home court where the game is not neutral (N). Games are the schedule as posted; tournaments and late additions appear as they are listed. Predictions are as of 2026-10-26 and reflect the roster as the model has it on that date.